AOpen AK86-L UPDATE: Uncommonly Good
by Wesley Fink on March 30, 2004 1:00 PM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
AOpen AK86-L: Overclocking and Stress Testing
FSB Overclocking Results
BIOS options don't mean much unless they can translate into improved performance. The AOpen AK86-L delivers overclocking as good as we have seen with this early Athlon 64 3200+.| Front Side Bus Overclocking Testbed | ||
| Default Voltage | Maximum Overclock | |
| Processor: | Athlon64 2.0GHz |
Athlon64 2.0GHz |
| CPU Voltage: | 1.5V (default) | 1.55V (Maximum vCore) |
| Cooling: | AMD Stock Athlon64 Heatsink/Fan | AMD Stock Athlon64 Heatsink/Fan |
| Power Supply: | Antec TruePower 430W | Antec TruePower 430W |
| Maximum OC: | 2223MHz (+11%) 222FSB |
2233MHz (+11.5%) 223FSB |
The above overclocking setup at default voltage allowed us to reach a stable FSB of 222. As you can see, increasing voltage did not help very much, topping out at 223. These are the highest overclocks that we have seen with this Athlon 64 and we suspect 222 is the limit on air-cooling with this CPU.
By dropping multipliers in the BIOS, we were able to reach FSB settings as high as 252. It appears that the AGP/PCI is ratio controlled and that it again drops to 33/66 at a setting of 234. This means the 252 is a PCI/AGP overclock of about 19 which is in-line with the maximum overclock our picky ATI 9800 can handle. This is not a working PCI lock as we have seen on Intel chipsets; it is a ratio-driven PCI/AGP frequency similar to the one we first saw on the Abit K8T800 motherboard.
Front Side Bus Stress Test Results:
As part of normal overclocking tests, a full range of stress tests and benchmarks were run to ensure the AK86-L was stable at each overclocked FSB speed. This included Prime95 torture tests, and the addition of other tasks - data compression, various DX8 and DX9 games, and apps like Word and Excel - while Prime95 was running in the background. Finally, we ran our benchmark suite, which includes Veritest Winstone 2004 suite, Unreal Tournament 2003, SPECviewperf 7.1, and Aquamark 3. 222MHz was the highest overclock that we were able to achieve with the AOpen while running these tests at default voltage.Memory Stress Test Results:
The memory stress test is very basic, as it simply tests the ability of the AK86-L to operate at its officially supported memory frequency (400MHz DDR) at the lowest supported memory timings that our Mushkin PC3500 Level 2 or OCZ PC3500 Platinum Ltd Modules will support. Memory stress testing was conducted by running RAM at 400MHz with 2 DIMM slots filled.| Stable DDR400 Timings - 2 DIMMs (2/3 DIMMs populated) |
|
| Clock Speed: | 200MHz |
| Timing Mode: | N/A |
| CAS Latency: | 2.0 |
| Bank Interleave: | N/A |
| RAS to CAS Delay: | 2T |
| RAS Precharge: | 6T |
| Precharge Delay: | 2T |
| Command Rate: | N/A |
We had no problem running 2 DS 512MB DIMMs of our standard Mushkin PC3500 Level2 or OCZ PC3500 Platinum Ltd in the AOpen AK86-L. Both of these memories were completely stable at the default memory voltage of 2.5V with the fastest 2-2-2-6 timings at DDR400.
Filling all available memory banks is more strenuous on the memory subsystem than testing 2 DIMMs. AOpen states clearly that only 2 DIMMs are supported at DDR400 speed, but we decided to try 3 DIMMs at that speed. At first, we thought 3 DIMMs were working fine in this board, but the AOpen BIOS had automatically lowered memory speed when 3 DIMMs were detected. We then forced DDR400, but could not get 3 DIMMs to work at this speed. By lowering the memory speed to DDR333, or setting to Auto and allowing the AOpen BIOS to manage the speed, we were able to run 3 DIMMs at fastest timings at DDR333. We did not have 1GB DIMMs for testing to check the AOpen claim of 2GB support for DDR400 and 3GB at DDR333.
| Stable DDR400 Timings - 3 DIMMs (3/3 DIMMs populated) |
|
| Clock Speed: | 166MHz |
| Timing Mode: | N/A |
| CAS Latency: | 2 |
| Bank Interleave: | N/A |
| RAS to CAS Delay: | 2T |
| RAS Precharge: | 6T |
| Precharge Delay: | 2T |
| Command Rate: | N/A |
We tested the memory timings with 2 banks filled using several stress tests and general applications to guarantee stability. Prime95 torture tests were successfully run at the timings listed in the above charts. We also ran Sciencemark (memory tests only) and Super Pi. None of the three stress tests created any stability problems for the AK86-L at these memory timings. These memory performance results are much better than we normally see with K8T800 chipset motherboards.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
22 Comments
View All Comments
Pumpkinierre - Monday, February 16, 2004 - link
In your update you say the new BIOS 1.06q includes cpu multipliers. But the old BIOS had that. So does this mean a larger range ie 0.5x divisions? Also now that you've got the Geiger, could you check the PCI lock at several clockspeeds?This is important to me as my interest in purchasing an a64 is to run it at high clockspeed (with only a mild o'clock) as I believe this would substanstially improve gaming performance. Of course this is also dependent on fast low latency DDR 466-500 being available- still yet to occur!.
Boonesmi - Thursday, February 12, 2004 - link
what about agp/pci lock? have you been able to test it yet??Wesley Fink - Thursday, February 12, 2004 - link
AOpen has just sent a revised BIOS 1.06Q, which adds vDimm adjustments from 2.5 to 3.0V in .05V increments. This is an outstanding upgrade from the 2.7v max vDimm in the BIOS we tested and makes the AK86-L one of the best 754 boards available for memory overclocking.A kind soul is hosting the 1.06q BIOS and a link has been added to the review.
JTDC - Tuesday, February 10, 2004 - link
Does anyone know where the 1.06 BIOS revision can be found? I cannot see it on the AOPEN site. Any suggestions as to where I can look?peonyu - Friday, February 6, 2004 - link
I have a Aopen board [not this one though,damn] and the options on it are awesome, same with its stability and performance. The only prob though is the same that this board has - VERY low voltage settings. For reasons i dont understand Aopen is very stubbern with allowing higher voltages, it happens with every board they release. So until they get past that and release a update which increases voltage I dont think it would be worth picking one of these up if your into overclocking.Shinei - Thursday, February 5, 2004 - link
Does Athlon 64 rely on timings as much as the Athlon XP did? I didn't think it did, considering the bandwidth it can use eclipses even the Pentium 4's...As for the article, now I really wish I'd waited a few months to upgrade, instead of going straight for the GA-7N400P2/2800+ in December...
Pumpkinierre - Thursday, February 5, 2004 - link
It would have been nice if you had included some benchmark results at the different multiplier o'clocks or even standardised to 2gig (ie 9x222,8x250) now that you have an A64 board that doesnt have memory, multiplier, HT or (from initial observations) AGP/PCI lock issues. Naturally memory latency settings would have to be kept the same. My pet theory with the A64 is that increasing the RAM speed and lowering memory latency (which appears difficult on many a64 mobo/memory combinations) would be as good as a standard o'clock which to date has'nt been the a64's strong point. This seems like the right board but we're still waiting for CAS2 DDR500.Boonesmi - Thursday, February 5, 2004 - link
dang i really like that board.when are you expecting the "PCI Geiger"??
hehe i want an update :)
Wesley Fink - Thursday, February 5, 2004 - link
#1 - Four "3-pin" fan headers is correct, and the typo is fixed.#2 - We will be reviewing a few of the memory brands you mention in a few weeks. A socket 754 board will be included in the tests.
bhtooefr - Thursday, February 5, 2004 - link
Damn, I want one! Of course, it would be even better if it were Micro ATX... (I've already got a mATX case, and it's very small)