Gigabyte K8NSNXP: Features and Layout


 Motherboard Specifications
CPU Interface Socket 754 Athlon 64
Chipset nVidia nForce3-250
CPU Ratios 4 to 25 in 0.5X increments
Bus Speeds 200MHz to 455MHz (in 1MHz increments)
PCI/AGP Speeds Auto, 66MHz to 100MHz (in 1MHz increments)
Core Voltage 0.80V to 1.7V in 0.025V increments
DRAM Voltage Normal, +0.1V, +0.2V
VDDQ (Chipset)Voltage Normal, +0.1V, +0.2V, +0.3V
HT (HyperTransport) Voltage Normal, +0.1V, +0.2V, +0.3V
Memory Slots Three 184-pin DDR DIMM Slots
Unbuffered Non-ECC Memory to 2GB Total
Expansion Slots 1 AGP 8X Slot
5 PCI Slots
Onboard SATA/RAID nVidia 2-Drive SATA (RAID 0, 1, JBOD) Plus
2-Drive SiI3512 (RAID 0, 1, JBOD)
Onboard IDE/RAID Two nVidia ATA133/100/66 (4 drives) PLUS
4-drive IT8212 GigaRAID RAID 0, 1, 0+1)
Onboard USB 2.0/IEEE-1394 8 USB 2.0 ports supported by nF3-250
3 1394B FireWire ports by VIA VT6306
Onboard LAN 1Gigabit Ethernet by Marvel 8001 PCI
10/100Ethernet by ICS1883
Onboard Audio Realtek ALC850
8-Channel with SPDIF

The Gigabyte K8NSNXP offers some of the widest adjustment ranges and the most complete feature set of any board in this roundup. Gigabyte has promoted the Dual capability in almost all their recent high-end boards, and the K8NSNXP continues that tradition. The trademark DPS card boosts power regulation to 6-phase for stability, SATA has both nVidia and Silicon Image controllers, IDE features nVidia regular IDE plus ITE GigaRAID, Audio is 8-channel, and there are even two LAN connectors. However, despite the incredibly long feature list for this top-end board, the system is still based on the nForce3-250 chipset and not the nForce3-250Gb. That means neither LAN is on-chip (they both appear to be tied to the PCI bus), and the nVidia Firewall is not a feature on the Gigabyte.



Gigabyte builds extremely solid motherboards, and this certainly shows in the construction of this clear-blue, full-size ATX motherboard with rounded corners. Attention to detail also shows in the almost ideal placement of components on the K8NSNXP, with IDE, Floppy, ATX 20-pin and 12V connectors all at near ideal locations. The only real complaint about layout is that the DPS card blocks air flow from a down-facing fan on the Power Supply when it is installed.

For those looking for great Firewire support, the Gigabyte comes through again with 3 1394B high-speed Firewire ports. Gigabyte has been supplying 1394B on its top motherboards for some months, and that continues with the K8NSNXP. Gigabyte also provides quiet active cooling for the single chip nForce3-250. On-board headers are also located for easy connection of front ports if that is a feature of your case.

Epox 8KDA3+: Overclocking and Stress Testing Gigabyte K8NSNXP: Overclocking and Stress Testing
Comments Locked

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • Odeen - Monday, May 31, 2004 - link

    There is a difference between SATA native to chipset, and SATA native to the OS.

    SATA native to chipset means the chipset runs the SATA internally, off the Hypertransport or V-Link bandwidth, which is at least a gigabyte/second.

    Intel's implementation of SATA is cool because to the OS it emulates a standard IDE controller. (Thus it's "native" to the OS.) The downside of this approach is that every OS other than XP gets horribly confused seeing two primary and two secondary controllers. (i.e. your PATA1 is Primary, your PATA2 is Secondary, your SATA1 is.. again Primary) Without "compatibility" options in the BIOS, which limits you to four drives total (i.e. SATA channels become masters on IDE1 and IDE2, with PATA masters becoming slaves, and PATA slaves dropping off the map, or, as an alternative, PATA2 disappearing, and SATA1 and SATA2 becoming PATA1 Master and PATA1 Slave) Win2K and DOS-based utilities (such as bootable Antivirus or Partitioning program CD's and utilities like the drive test disks that you get with a hard drive,) fail on startup.

    Running SATA as a SCSI-over-IDE, requiring drivers, is a more flexible approach, but requires the use of driver floppies. Still, there's something neat about having four drives all hooked up as masters (2 SATA / 2 PATA) and installing XP without driver floppies.

    I'm not sure how it can be remotely possible with a 4 drive SATA controller, though.
  • sprockkets - Monday, May 31, 2004 - link

    Does anybody know if the NF3 chipset has any functionality similar to Intel's SATA, like is SATA done natively without needing any special drivers or programs for the os to use or understand?
  • rms - Monday, May 31, 2004 - link

    I also would have preferred to see feature benchmarking instead of cpu/memory benchmarking.

    rms
  • Zak - Sunday, May 30, 2004 - link

    2 RAM slots on the Abit mobo??? They call THAT an improvement??? Why can't there be at least 4? With 1GB chips' prices being still very high that would be a major selling point for many. I'd upgrade my mobo instantly if I could stick 4 512MB DDR400 chips and not have them run at 333...

    Zak
  • Odeen - Sunday, May 30, 2004 - link

    I'm very surprised that none of the motherboards except for MSI actually implemented all the features of their chipsets. Both the NF3-250GB and the K8T800 Pro support 4 chipset-level SATA ports, but only MSI has all 4. If it wasn't for that Corecell silliness, I'd be taking a long, hard look at the MSI board.
  • Crassus - Sunday, May 30, 2004 - link

    Whats the point of showing benchmarks when all the boards perform within margin of error? When the memory controller is part of the CPU there's IMHO little point in benchmarking it.

    Why not go after the components that make a bigger difference, esp. HDD, Ethernet and stuff in terms of throughput, CPU utilisation and so?
  • JustAnAverageGuy - Saturday, May 29, 2004 - link

    #11

    In RAM, generally speed increases are more noticible in real world performance than timings.

    Obviously if you have 400 cas 3-3-3-8, versus 400 cas 2-2-2-11, 2-2-2-11 would win. Generally though, speed is more important than timings after a certain point.

  • bigtoe33 - Saturday, May 29, 2004 - link

    #9

    I think you may have one of these supposed 3000 boards that have non-pro chipsets that Abit says are pro chipsets but really appear to be not..

    I would take your issue to Abit.
  • qquizz - Saturday, May 29, 2004 - link

    Concerning the overclock. I can overclock the crap out of my XP2100+, but I keep it at levels where it's stable using Prime95 and Memtest. I wonder if these overclocks can meet my standards?
  • gplracer - Saturday, May 29, 2004 - link

    All of the ram in this comparision was CAS3. I wonder how the CAS3 at 270mhz compares to CAS@ at 250mhz. I run my corsair at that speed now.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now