915 Motherboard Roundup: Socket 775 for the Rest of Us
by Wesley Fink on December 7, 2004 12:25 AM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
AOpen i915Pa-EFRII: Overclocking and Stress Testing
FSB Overclocking Results
Front Side Bus Overclocking Testbed | |
Processor: | Pentium 4 Prescott LGA 775 560 ES (2.8GHz-3.6GHz) |
CPU Voltage: | 1.425V (1.3675V default) |
Cooling: | Thermaltake Jungle 502 |
Power Supply: | OCZ Power Stream 520 |
Maximum CPU OverClock: | 217x18 (3996MHz) +9% |
Maximum FSB OC: | 217FSB x 14 (+9%) |
When the 915/925X boards first appeared, there was a lot of talk about a 10% overclock built into the 915/925X chipset. Manufacturers of boards that cater to enthusiasts, like Abit, Asus and DFI, quickly found ways to get around this design issue, but others did not seem to see this as a big problem. AOpen falls into the latter category here. Whether at stock multiplier or the Speedstep reduced 14X, the AOpen will reach 217 and nothing more.
Most users never overclock, and the AOpen is a great board for them, since it contains all the important performance features that are missing on many other 915 boards in the roundup. However, overclockers should look elsewhere for a 915 board as they will be very frustrated to be limited to a 9% overclock.
Memory Stress Test Results:
The memory stress test measures the ability of the AOpen i915Pa to operate at its officially supported memory frequency (533MHz DDR2), at the best performing memory timings that Crucial/Micron PC2-4300U will support. Memory stress testing was conducted by running DDR2 at 533MHz (stock 3:4 ratio) with 2 DIMM slots operating in Dual-Channel mode.Stable DDR533 Timings - 2 DIMMs (2/4 DIMMs - 1 Dual-Channel Bank) |
|
Clock Speed: | 266MHz |
Timing Mode: | 3:4 (200:266 - Default) |
CAS Latency: | 3.0 |
Bank Interleave: | Auto |
RAS to CAS Delay: | 3 |
RAS Precharge: | 3 |
Cycle Time (tRAS): | 10* |
Command Rate: | N/A |
The AOpen i915Pa was completely stable with 2 DIMMs in Dual-Channel at the DDR2 settings of 3-3-3-10 at 1.8V default voltage. These are much faster settings than the DDR2 SPD and rated timings of 4-4-4-12.
Filling all four available memory slots is more strenuous on the memory subsystem than testing 2 DDR2 modules on a motherboard.
Stable DDR533 Timings - 4 DIMMs (4/4 DIMMs - 2 Dual-Channel Banks) |
|
Clock Speed: | 266MHz |
Timing Mode: | 3:4 (200:266 - Default) |
CAS Latency: | 4.0 |
Bank Interleave: | Auto |
RAS to CAS Delay: | 3 |
RAS Precharge: | 3 |
Cycle Time (tRAS): | 10 |
Command Rate: | N/A |
DDR has a long benchmarking history that makes it easier to figure out where to go with memory timings. We are still in the learning curve with DDR2, and the old DDR patterns just do not work in DDR2. We found that no matter what the rest of the settings, 4 DIMMs with DDR2 generally required CAS 4 for stability. Timings like 3-4-3 or 3-4-4 appeared to work fine, and then we were suddenly facing hard drive corruption. Our advice for now is to use CAS 4 with 4 DIMMs for stability, although 4-3-3 timings did work fine on most of the test boards. If you plan on trying to raise voltage to attempt lower CAS with 4 DIMMs, then please backup your system first.
26 Comments
View All Comments
coldpower27 - Tuesday, December 7, 2004 - link
Of course the Pentium 4 560 is gonna be outperformed, The Pentium 4 560 is designed to compete at the 417US price point while the Athlon FX 55 is designed for the 827US, were talking double the P4 560 in price. i believethe closest competitor for the Pentium 4 560 in price is probably the Athlon 64 3700+ even though it is on Single Channel DDR.danidentity - Tuesday, December 7, 2004 - link
Even the 3800+ could be included, but that is still about $180 more expensive than the 560, according to Newegg.danidentity - Tuesday, December 7, 2004 - link
I know comments like I'm about to make have been made before, and I am not biased, but I wanted to reiterate.Why is the FX-55 even part of the benchmarks in this review? Why not a 3500+? The FX-55 is TWICE the price of the Pentium 560 according to current Newegg prices.
I know the argument will be that the FX-55 and the 560 are two of the highest performing chips from the two camps. But the fact of the matter is that most people shopping for a 560 aren't going to be shopping for a FX-55. It's in an entirely different class.
mongoosesRawesome - Tuesday, December 7, 2004 - link
Can you do a comparison between soundstorm and dolby digital live? What is the bitrate of the encoding? Frequency range? Overall quality?It seems like this may be the second time I pass on AC3 encoding though. Last time I chose a northwood platform over AMD and NF2, and this time I'll likely choose the NF4 over intel and dolby digital live.
Would be nice to be able to easily hook it up to my klipsch dolby digital decodor though...
anandtechrocks - Tuesday, December 7, 2004 - link
Thanks for the great review!MAME - Tuesday, December 7, 2004 - link
AMD >>>>>>>>>>>>> *