Gaming Performance

SLI

Gaming Performance - SLI

Gaming Performance - SLI

Gaming Performance - SLI

Gaming Performance - SLI

Gaming Performance - SLI

Gaming Performance - SLI


Single Video

Gaming Performance - Single Video

Gaming Performance - Single Video

Gaming Performance - Single Video

Gaming Performance - Single Video

Gaming Performance - Single Video

Gaming Performance - Single Video

If there is any area where Dual x16 SLI will make a difference, it is in gaming. However, given the state of current PCIe video cards, we really didn't expect any increases in performance in moving from dual x8 to dual x16, and certainly no performance increase in comparing current x16 single video to the Asus A8N 32-SLI Deluxe x16 single video.

Since the DFI and Asus were both tested with the same CPU, memory, video cards, and video drivers, let's compare performance in SLI mode as a percentage increase in the six tested games.

SLI - NVIDIA 81.85 Drivers, 6.82 Platform
Game DFI nF4 SLI-DR (2 x8) Asus A8N32-SLI (2 x16) % Increase
Aquamark 3 86332 87813 +1.7
Far Cry 74.3 78.3 +5.4
Doom 3 95.0 95.9 +1.0
Splinter Cell-Chaos Theory 76.0 77.7 +2.2
Quake 4 94.5 102.1 +8.0
F.E.A.R. 74.0 80 +8.1

Using the same video drivers and components, the Asus Dual x16 was 1% to 8.1% faster than the DFI Dual x8. These increases are small enough that we took a closer look at single card performance to see if the real difference was Dual x16 or something else.

Single Video - NVIDIA 81.85 Drivers, 6.82 Platform
Game DFI nF4 SLI-DR (1 x16) Asus A8N32-SLI (1 x16) % Increase
Aquamark 3 82608 84089 +1.8
Far Cry 47.3 47.5 +0.4
Doom 3 53.3 53.3 0.0
Splinter Cell-Chaos Theory 40.5 47.5 +17.3
Quake 4 70.1 78.3 +11.7
F.E.A.R. 49 56 +14.3

In single video card mode, we were completely surprised to find performance increases on the Asus as high as 17.3%. This is an even higher performance increase than SLI mode, but in this case, both the DFI and Asus are running a single card in x16 mode. How is this possible? We re-ran benches several times and attained the same results. It is also interesting that while there is almost no increase in single mode in "older" games, the newest and most demanding titles show the biggest increases.

Perhaps the MCP51 is more efficient than the older nF4 SLI chip, or perhaps the design of the AMD Dual x16 improves video performance across the board. Or maybe the 8-phase Asus design really makes a difference. We won't know the true answer until we do much more testing on the new Dual x16 boards. Whatever the explanations that will be found, it is clear that the Asus A8N32-SLI is slightly faster in older game titles in both single-video and SLI modes. In newer and more demanding games, the Asus can be 8% to 17% faster than the best of the current dual x8 solutions.

Graphics Performance and Encoding NVIDIA SLI-AA
Comments Locked

95 Comments

View All Comments

  • DrZoidberg - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link

    yes this is a very nice board with the cooler 8 phase design, and heatpipe, no more annoying tiny chipset fan. However, i think this board will be over $200USD =(
  • anandtechrocks - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link

    Yea, this looks like a very nice board. Now I'm looking at the new DFI NF4 Expert, those sweet Saphire ATI boards, and this one! So many choices!!
  • One43637 - Tuesday, December 6, 2005 - link

    i'm looking to put a new system together and i am also looking at this board.

    i'm not famaliar with AMD chipsets, but will this board work with the new AMD X2s?
  • michal1980 - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link

    this sucks, haven't evn put my system togther with my epox sli board, and now a board that gives u a 17% boost, CRAP.
  • Brian23 - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link

    Anandtech: You say we should upgrade our drivers to the latest for increased performance. However, I am unable to find the 6.82 platform driver anywhere.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now