Ethernet Performance

The current motherboard test suite includes LAN performance measurements. All of these boards utilize PCI Express controllers with the only difference being the supplier of the core logic.

The Windows 2000 Driver Development Kit (DDK) includes a useful LAN testing utility called NTttcp. We used the NTttcp tool to test Ethernet throughput and the CPU utilization of the various Ethernet Controllers used on the Intel 975x motherboards.

We set up one machine as the server; in this test, an Intel system with an Intel CSA Gigabit LAN connection. Intel CSA has a reputation for providing fast throughput and this seemed to be a reasonable choice to serve our Gigabit LAN clients.

At the server side, we used the following Command Line as suggested by the VIA whitepaper on LAN testing:
Ntttcpr -m 4 ,0,‹server IP› -a 4 -l 256000 -n 30000
On the client side (the motherboard under test), we used the following Command Line:
Ntttcps -m 4 ,0,‹client IP› -a 4 -l 256000 -n 30000
At the conclusion of the test, we captured the throughput and CPU utilization figures from the client screen.

Ethernet Throughput

Ethernet Throughput

The Marvell 88E8053 PCI Express x1 LAN solution exhibits excellent throughput along with acceptable CPU utilization rates. The Broadcom 5789KFB option on the Gigabyte board offers excellent throughput with very good CPU utilization compared to the other solutions. The Marvell 88E8062 PCI Express x4 LAN solution continues to offer the highest standard throughput of the tested options.

All standard Ethernet tests were performed with standard frames and the NVIDIA Active Armor suite was disabled unless otherwise noted. Gigabit Ethernet supports Jumbo frames as well and provides a further reduction in CPU overhead. We added another test scenario in which ActiveArmor and Jumbo frames were enabled on the Asus P5N32-SLI Deluxe board via the 6.82 WHQL platform driver set. This is shown for illustrative purposes and shows the favorable impact of this technology.

Firewire and USB Performance Audio Performance
Comments Locked

20 Comments

View All Comments

  • Dfere - Thursday, May 18, 2006 - link

    Just bought this and I am having a problem even getting this to post. Fans boot and HD starts to boot. No video image, monitor resets and then blanks.

    I stripped out unnecesary components- still no joy.

    I have an Thermaltake XaserIII 480 with adapter and EZ 4 plug molex connected.
    SATA 1 Port using WD 80 gig HD
    Pentium D 805 w/ stock heatsink.
    Inno3d 6200 TC video in 1st PCI 16 slot.

    2X1 Gig PNY memory in Black series of slots.

    I will be trying to use only one stock of memory, and then will be taking MB out of case and trying to boot on non-conducitve surface. Anyone else got advice?
  • TechJunkie - Friday, March 3, 2006 - link

    I've had it now for almost a week and have started noticing problems. Many forums are now littered with complaints, mainly aimed at the Marvell issue.

    I mistakenly had set up my system the first time with the Intel chipset and using "Standard IDE"... system worked fine other than the issue with the Marvell. Benchmarks ran fine and 3DMark06 looked great.

    I then reinstalled the OS, this time doing the PITA F6 procedure and set up the drives on the Intel controller using RAID (but didn't actually set up a RAID, simply wanted the AHCI with the ability to in the future set up RAID).

    This morning I tried to run the 3DMark06 benchmark and while it ran to completion, the graphics screen seemed all corrupted throughout...I'm thinking power problem but it didn't have this issue last go around. Can setting up the drives differently have caused this from a power perspective or is this just one of the possibly many things wrong with this board?

    I am wondering if I should RMA it back to zipzoom and get the Intel board, which has always been my choice, except this time the extra SATAII ports provided by the Marvell persuaded me to give ASUS a shot...ironic, isn't it!

    In your opinion, based on what you know, will the issues with this board be resolved by BIOS/driver updates? It is a PITA to take my rig apart to swap out the motherboard but I will bite the bullet and get the Intel 975X board if this board can't be fixed via BIOS/driver updates.
  • medic91b2 - Monday, February 6, 2006 - link

    I've had this m/b for a few week's and I have to say that it has many bug's in it. As far as i know, no one has gotten the marvell sata driver's to work and on the intel side people have gotten many mixed result's. I gave up trying to make a raid on this board. Asus support is nowere to be found, I think if any one want's to rate it then yhey should test all of the components of the board
  • Gary Key - Saturday, February 11, 2006 - link

    quote:

    I've had this m/b for a few week's and I have to say that it has many bug's in it. As far as i know, no one has gotten the marvell sata driver's to work and on the intel side people have gotten many mixed result's. I gave up trying to make a raid on this board. Asus support is nowere to be found, I think if any one want's to rate it then yhey should test all of the components of the board


    Email me and I will provide you with an updated bios that solves the USB issue and voltage spikes. I still have not had an issue with the Marvell RAID setup and two Raptors.
  • Zucker2k - Wednesday, February 15, 2006 - link

    Gary,
    Could you please e-mail me the updated bios? email: qommonsense@gmail.com. Thanks.
    Richard.
  • Joepublic2 - Wednesday, January 18, 2006 - link

    As far as the motherboard goes, it looks pretty good. NB/SB are passively cooled, the layout is good and the MOSFETs are heatsinked (I've heard of problems with the voltage regulators on cheaper intel boards failing, often because they got too hot). I like how Anandtech's motherboard articles are very critical and mention things that other sites seem to glaze over, such as if the board's voltage regulator is three, four or eight phase.

    quote:

    considering this processors penchant for electricity


    should read "processor's"
  • Gary Key - Thursday, January 19, 2006 - link

    quote:

    should read "processor's"


    It is corrected. I had it marked on the final edit but missed it before publication, excuse the Homer moment please. :-) It is a good board but we felt like Asus did not go all the way on it and should have considering the price point. Although the board is not in retail yet we were somewhat disappointed with the bios also. Asus is working on a new release at this time and we hope to be able to test it in the next roundup.
  • ghg - Monday, January 23, 2006 - link

    Hi

    When may we expect the ANANDTECH 975x shootout ?

    BR

    Gary G.
  • Gary Key - Monday, January 23, 2006 - link

    quote:

    When may we expect the ANANDTECH 975x shootout ?


    We should be finished in about three weeks. We have two additional boards in house and another two on their way. We will also have an overclocking shoot out with the Presler and Cedar Mill chips.
  • ghg - Friday, March 3, 2006 - link

    Hi

    Any news about the 975x shootout ?

    BR

    Gary G.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now