Intel P965: Mid-Range Performance Sector Roundup
by Gary Key on October 20, 2006 9:00 PM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
Abit AB9-Pro: Overclocking
FSB Overclocking Results
Our E6300 posted very good results when compared to our earlier overclocking test results that resulted in a maximum FSB speed of 366. However, the 7x436FSB level is the lowest of our test group today and does not match up to the promise of this board's performance. We also have an issue with our CPU requiring 1.4375V on this board to reach a stable 3.05GHz. We normally only require 1.40V in order to reach this level and noticed the board would not boot without an increase to 1.4375V although it was rock stable at this setting. Vdroop averaged around .02V to .03V during overclocking and heavy system loads. Our memory is usually very stable up to DDR2-900 at 4-3-3-10 settings but required slightly looser timings on this board. Although the overclocking results are not as high as our other boards, the ability to now run up to 436FSB in a stable manner is fine for the majority of people who want to overclock.
Memory Stress Testing
Memory stress tests look at the ability of the Abit AB9-Pro to operate at the official DDR2-800 memory frequency at the best performing memory timings our GEIL PC2-6400 can achieve on this board.
The Abit AB9-Pro was very stable with 2 DDR2 modules in Dual-Channel mode at the settings of 3-3-3-9 at 2.2V with the 1.4 and above BIOS. By increasing the voltage to 2.25V we could run at 3-3-3-6 timings although there were not any real performance improvements unless we utilized MemSet to change other latency settings.
We had to change our timings to 3-4-3-10 from 3-3-3-9 when installing two additional modules. We were able to keep our voltage set to 2.20V at this setting. We were able to maintain these settings up to a 7x405FSB, DDR2-810, setting with 2.30V. Our maximum overclock with four DIMMs installed was 7x418FSB, DDR2-836 4-4-3-12, with the memory set at 2.30V. Once again, we had to use BIOS 1.4 or higher in order for these settings to work.
In fact, on the first two BIOS releases this particular memory would not even boot when installed in this board. The memory itself is designed to run at 2.0V or higher depending upon the latencies selected. GEIL actually rates this memory at 2.4V for 3-4-3-8 operation at DDR2-800 although we have not required voltages above 2.2V at this setting.
FSB Overclocking Results
| Abit AB9-Pro Overclocking Testbed |
|
| Processor: | Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 Dual Core, 1.86GHz, 2MB Unified Cache 1066FSB, 7x Multiplier |
| CPU Voltage: | 1.4375V (default 1.3250V) |
| Cooling: | Scythe Infinity Air Cooling |
| Power Supply: | OCZ GameXStream 700W |
| Memory: | Geil PC2-6400 800MHz Plus (2x1GB- GX22GB6400PDC) (Micron Memory Chips) |
| Video Cards: | 1 x MSI X1950XTX |
| Hard Drive: | Seagate 320GB 7200RPM SATA2 16MB Buffer |
| Case: | Cooler Master CM Stacker 830 |
| Maximum CPU OC: (Standard Ratio) |
436x7 (4-4-4-12, 1:1, 2.3V) 3052MHz (+64%) |
| . | |
 |
| Click to enlarge |
Our E6300 posted very good results when compared to our earlier overclocking test results that resulted in a maximum FSB speed of 366. However, the 7x436FSB level is the lowest of our test group today and does not match up to the promise of this board's performance. We also have an issue with our CPU requiring 1.4375V on this board to reach a stable 3.05GHz. We normally only require 1.40V in order to reach this level and noticed the board would not boot without an increase to 1.4375V although it was rock stable at this setting. Vdroop averaged around .02V to .03V during overclocking and heavy system loads. Our memory is usually very stable up to DDR2-900 at 4-3-3-10 settings but required slightly looser timings on this board. Although the overclocking results are not as high as our other boards, the ability to now run up to 436FSB in a stable manner is fine for the majority of people who want to overclock.
Memory Stress Testing
 |
| Click to enlarge |
Memory stress tests look at the ability of the Abit AB9-Pro to operate at the official DDR2-800 memory frequency at the best performing memory timings our GEIL PC2-6400 can achieve on this board.
| Abit AB9-Pro Stable DDR2-800 Timings - 2 DIMMs (2/4 slots populated - 1 Dual-Channel Bank) |
|
| Clock Speed: | 800MHz |
| CAS Latency: | 3 |
| RAS to CAS Delay: | 3 |
| RAS Precharge: | 3 |
| RAS Cycle Time: | 9 |
| Voltage: | 2.20V |
The Abit AB9-Pro was very stable with 2 DDR2 modules in Dual-Channel mode at the settings of 3-3-3-9 at 2.2V with the 1.4 and above BIOS. By increasing the voltage to 2.25V we could run at 3-3-3-6 timings although there were not any real performance improvements unless we utilized MemSet to change other latency settings.
| Abit AB9-Pro Stable DDR2-800 Timings - 4 DIMMs (4/4 slots populated - 2 Dual-Channel Bank) |
|
| Clock Speed: | 800MHz |
| CAS Latency: | 3 |
| RAS to CAS Delay: | 4 |
| RAS Precharge: | 3 |
| RAS Cycle Time: | 10 |
| Voltage: | 2.20V |
We had to change our timings to 3-4-3-10 from 3-3-3-9 when installing two additional modules. We were able to keep our voltage set to 2.20V at this setting. We were able to maintain these settings up to a 7x405FSB, DDR2-810, setting with 2.30V. Our maximum overclock with four DIMMs installed was 7x418FSB, DDR2-836 4-4-3-12, with the memory set at 2.30V. Once again, we had to use BIOS 1.4 or higher in order for these settings to work.
In fact, on the first two BIOS releases this particular memory would not even boot when installed in this board. The memory itself is designed to run at 2.0V or higher depending upon the latencies selected. GEIL actually rates this memory at 2.4V for 3-4-3-8 operation at DDR2-800 although we have not required voltages above 2.2V at this setting.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
62 Comments
View All Comments
vailr - Saturday, October 21, 2006 - link
Re:So, how about the (yet unreleased) ATI and NVidia Conroe chipset boards?
Does either chipset include PATA support?
Thanks.
Gary Key - Saturday, October 21, 2006 - link
They both have native support for two drives.
n7 - Saturday, October 21, 2006 - link
Gary, always love your reviews!I read thru the whole thing, & it was a good read :)
Meticulous detail, as well great sarcastic humor as well.
I look forward to the following parts.
Sho - Friday, October 20, 2006 - link
In an earlier AnandTech article, the one about Kentsfield support, it was written that Gigabyte would bring a revision 2.0 of all of their P965 boards to the market in mid-October, including the DS3. The article does not mention whether the board tested was this new rev 2,9 or any other. Could that be clarified?And does anybody know what was changed/fixed in 2.0?
Gary Key - Friday, October 20, 2006 - link
Gigabyte has not released any further details on the revision 2 boards except for the fact they were addressing some layout issues and possible BIOS improvements. The only major change we could see them making would be going from a three phase power design on the DS3 to a five phase system as an example. The board we tested is still revision 1.Sho - Saturday, October 21, 2006 - link
Thanks!dreddly - Friday, October 20, 2006 - link
'caliper' should be caliber on AB9Pro pageGreat work on this roundup though, impressive job.
Puddyglum1 - Friday, October 20, 2006 - link
Which board? The topic of the previous page was about sound cards vs. onboard audio. Is there a missing page? Why is there a picture of the Asus heatsink and no mention of which board is the preferred of the bunch?Just some questions =)
Great article for Cost/Performance comparison.
Puddyglum1 - Friday, October 20, 2006 - link
Woah, there's a lot more there now. Thanks for the explanation.I just built a workstation for a client using the 965P-DS3, but the board was DOA. I went to a local shop and picked up a 965P-S3 instead (seeing as how the only main feature missing was the solid capacitors of the -DS3), and it performed just as well as the DS3. For $110, a GA-965P-S3 would be the best Cost/Performance of the 965P bunch, in my unresearched opinion.
JarredWalton - Friday, October 20, 2006 - link
Now you're skipping ahead to part 2! :p