System Performance

Not all motherboards are created equal. On the face of it, they should all perform the same and differ only in the functionality they provide - however, this is not the case. The obvious pointers are power consumption, but also the ability for the manufacturer to optimize USB speed, audio quality (based on audio codec), POST time and latency. This can come down to manufacturing process and prowess, so these are tested.

Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system while in a single ASUS GTX 980 GPU configuration with a wall meter connected to the Thermaltake 1200W power supply. This power supply has ~75% efficiency > 50W, and 90%+ efficiency at 250W, suitable for both idle and multi-GPU loading. This method of power reading allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency. These are the real world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor) using this motherboard.

While this method for power measurement may not be ideal, and you feel these numbers are not representative due to the high wattage power supply being used (we use the same PSU to remain consistent over a series of reviews, and the fact that some boards on our test bed get tested with three or four high powered GPUs), the important point to take away is the relationship between the numbers. These boards are all under the same conditions, and thus the differences between them should be easy to spot.

Power Long Idle (w/GTX 980)Power OS Idle (w/GTX 980)Power OCCT (w/GTX 980)

From the current trend within our B350/X370 power testing, ASRock boards (with the exclusion of the X370 Pro Gaming) have tended to perform pretty well against other boards on test. The X370 Gaming-ITX/ac shows respectable performance at both idle and long idle power states, with another good showing while at full load.

Non-UEFI POST Time

Different motherboards have different POST sequences before an operating system is initialized. A lot of this is dependent on the board itself, and POST boot time is determined by the controllers on board (and the sequence of how those extras are organized). As part of our testing, we look at the POST Boot Time using a stopwatch. This is the time from pressing the ON button on the computer to when Windows starts loading. (We discount Windows loading as it is highly variable given Windows specific features.)

Non UEFI POST Time

In a twist to our testing, the ASRock X370 Gaming-ITX/ac seems to boot considerably faster than the rest of the pack when the UEFI BIOS defaults are enabled. In our stripped POST time metric, the time was improved upon by around half a second.

Rightmark Audio Analyzer 6.2.5

Rightmark:AA indicates how well the sound system is built and isolated from electrical interference (either internally or externally). For this test we connect the Line Out to the Line In using a short six inch 3.5mm to 3.5mm high-quality jack, turn the OS speaker volume to 100%, and run the Rightmark default test suite at 192 kHz, 24-bit. The OS is tuned to 192 kHz/24-bit input and output, and the Line-In volume is adjusted until we have the best RMAA value in the mini-pretest. We look specifically at the Dynamic Range of the audio codec used on the rear panel of the board.

Rightmark Audio Analyzer 6.2.5: Dynamic Range

All of the boards equipped with Realtek ALC1220 codecs perform a little bit better than the cheaper ALC892 alternatives. While the ASRock X370 Gaming-ITX/ac does include PCB separation, and with ITX boards usually being hit with a slight penalty, it doesn't appear to be the case with this particular model.

DPC Latency

Deferred Procedure Call latency is a way in which Windows handles interrupt servicing. In order to wait for a processor to acknowledge the request, the system will queue all interrupt requests by priority. Critical interrupts will be handled as soon as possible, whereas lesser priority requests such as audio will be further down the line. If the audio device requires data, it will have to wait until the request is processed before the buffer is filled.

If the device drivers of higher priority components in a system are poorly implemented, this can cause delays in request scheduling and process time. This can lead to an empty audio buffer and characteristic audible pauses, pops and clicks. The DPC latency checker measures how much time is taken processing DPCs from driver invocation. The lower the value will result in better audio transfer at smaller buffer sizes. Results are measured in microseconds.

Deferred Procedure Call Latency

None of the manufacturers boards that have been on test so far have been optimized for DPC latency. The ASRock boards have generally done well in regards to DPC latency compared to other manufacturers like MSI and GIGABYTE, but the X370 Gaming-ITX/ac does fall a little short of its bigger M-ATX and ATX siblings that have been tested so far.

Test Bed and Setup CPU Performance, Short Form
Comments Locked

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • 5080 - Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - link

    If have built a few systems using this board and the B350, but was never able to get a Bristol Ridge APU to work. I followed the approved memory list from ASRock without success. I Always ended up using a Ryzen CPU and Cheap GPU or since March Raven Ridge. It would be interesting if anyone else got this to work with a Bristol Ridge APU?
  • gavbon - Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - link

    If I had a Bristol Ridge APU to hand, I would have tried for you! I have used a Ryzen 3 2200G though and it worked fine :)
  • 5080 - Thursday, April 19, 2018 - link

    Yes, I just finished building a system for a friend with this board and Ryzen 5 2400G. It works great, but Bristol Ridge is still a no go even with the latest BIOS 4.50.
  • Geranium - Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - link

    Gavin, are you sure this board has USB 3.1? Cause Asrock's website has no mention of USB 3.1.
    http://www.asrock.com/mb/AMD/Fatal1ty%20X370%20Gam...
  • SuperiorSpecimen - Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - link

    3rd bullet point from the bottom of the first list.
  • jtd871 - Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - link

    I only see 1 19-pin USB3 header on the mobo top.
  • jtd871 - Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - link

    ASRock manual sez that header supports up to two ports.
  • gavbon - Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - link

    I have the board in my hands now (you had me second guessing myself) and I can confirm there is a USB 3.1 Gen1 header and a USB 2.0 header; each of them gives an additional two ports.
  • gavbon - Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - link

    I think the confusion is where it says 2 x header (it means 2 ports from a header, not 2 headers etc) - Maybe I should make it clearer in the future!
  • gavbon - Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - link

    Yeah was a total brain fart on the USB 3.1 Gen2, for some reasons it's been ingrained in my brain from lack of sleep and X470! - I blame the lack of Kenco in my cupboard! - Edited now, they are USB 3.0 (Type-C included)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now