The Corsair MP400 1TB QLC NVMe SSD: A Quick Review
by Billy Tallis on December 11, 2020 2:00 PM ESTConclusion: Entry Level QLC
The Corsair MP400 has proved to be a competent budget NVMe SSD in its 1TB version. The recent crop of drives like the Corsair MP400 and Sabrent Rocket has raised the bar for consumer QLC SSDs. That being said, the a 1TB QLC drive is relatively low capacity for the controller, and there are performance compromises that go along with that (compared to the 8TB relatives we looked at last week). At mainstream capacities they can compete against many budget TLC SSDs, and at the higher capacities where there are few or no budget TLC options, many of the benefits of QLC NAND come into play.
The MP400 sits on the boundary between a good TLC drive and an entry level QLC drive. It performs as expected, and the key arbiter in going for this drive is going to be in the cost.
When Does QLC Make Sense? An Overview
Based on our testing, QLC drive capacities below 1TB (such as 500 GB), we recommend avoiding QLC SSDs. These smaller capacities are where DRAMless TLC SSDs are clearly the better value, and more mainstream TLC drives with DRAM are often on sale for entry-level prices as well. Above 1TB, the DRAMless TLC options are few and far between, and we don't expect any of them to handle heavier workloads as easily as 2+TB QLC drives with DRAM do.
At the 1TB capacity point we're focused on today, the conclusion is not as clear. The Corsair MP400 generally outperformed the low-end TLC drives we have to compare against, though our collection is missing a few of the best-performing budget TLC options on the market today. It is pretty clear that DRAMless TLC SSDs have the edge in power efficiency.
For general purpose consumer desktop usage, both QLC and TLC entry-level NVMe drives offer better performance than SATA SSDs, and with little or no price premium. Which kind of entry-level NVMe drive is the better really comes down to day to day pricing.
Budget NVMe Consumer SSD Price Comparison December 11, 2020 |
|||||||
PCIe DRAM |
NAND | 500GB | 1TB | 2TB | 4TB | 8TB | |
NVMe PCIe 3.0 | |||||||
ADATA XPG SX8100 | 3.0 x4 Yes |
TLC 8ch |
$59.99 (12¢/GB) | $94.99 (9¢/GB) |
$229.99 (11¢/GB) | $499.99 (12¢/GB) | - |
ADATA Swordfish | 3.0 x4 No |
TLC 4ch |
$54.99 (11¢/GB) | $94.99 (9¢/GB) |
$189.99 (9¢/GB) | - | - |
Corsair MP400 | 3.0 x4 Yes |
QLC 8ch |
- | $114.99 (11¢/GB) | $244.99 (12¢/GB) | $662.00 (17¢/GB) | $1498.00 (19¢/GB) |
Inland Platinum | 3.0 x4 Yes |
QLC 8ch |
- | $94.99 (9¢/GB) |
$193.99 (10¢/GB) | $499.99 (12¢/GB) | - |
Intel 660p | 3.0 x4 Yes |
QLC 4ch |
$59.99 (12¢/GB) | $109.99 (11¢/GB) | $209.99 (10¢/GB) | - | - |
Intel 665p | 3.0 x4 Yes |
QLC 4ch |
- | $109.99 (11¢/GB) | $239.99 (12¢/GB) | - | - |
Kingston A2000 | 3.0 x4 Yes |
TLC 4ch |
$53.99 (11¢/GB) | $102.99 (10¢/GB) | - | - | - |
Mushkin ALPHA | 3.0 x4 Yes |
QLC 8ch |
- | - | - | $599.99 (15¢/GB) | $1299.99 (16¢/GB) |
Mushkin Helix-L | 3.0 x4 No |
TLC 4ch |
$54.99 (11¢/GB) | $89.99 (9¢/GB) |
- | - | - |
Sabrent Rocket Q | 3.0 x4 Yes |
QLC 8ch |
$64.99 (13¢/GB) | $109.98 (11¢/GB) | $219.98 (11¢/GB) | $599.98 (15¢/GB) | $1299.99 (16¢/GB) |
WD Blue SN550 | 3.0 x4 No |
TLC 8ch |
$53.99 (11¢/GB) | $104.99 (10¢/GB) | $247.99 (12¢/GB) | - | - |
NVMe PCIe 4.0 | |||||||
Sabrent Rocket Q 4.0 | 4.0 x4 Yes |
QLC 8ch |
- | $149.98 (15¢/GB) | $319.99 (16¢/GB) | $689.98 (17¢/GB) | - |
Addlink S92 | 4.0 x4 Yes |
QLC 8ch |
- | $145.88 (15¢/GB) | $277.88 (14¢/GB) | $649.99 (16¢/GB) | - |
SATA | |||||||
Samsung 870 QVO | SATA Yes |
QLC | - | $89.99 (9¢/GB) |
$199.99 (10¢/GB) | $419.99 (10¢/GB) | $861.27 (11¢/GB) |
The handful of multi-TB QLC drives using the Phison E12S controller are competing not just on price, but on the vendor's ability to keep the drive in stock. From day to day, we're seeing the best-priced models quickly end up backordered, so there's clearly demand for these massive SSDs but the prices should drift downward a bit as these drives become more widely available from multiple brands. The Corsair MP400 hasn't been on the market for as long as the Sabrent Rocket Q, so the latter currently has it beat on pricing and availability. Microcenter's Inland Platinum QLC drive seems to still be the cheapest Phison E12S+QLC drive on the market, with especially attractive pricing for the 4TB model.
Even though the proliferation of new QLC alternatives has broadened the scope of the entry-level NVMe market segment, these drives are still almost always overshadowed by the best deals in the more mainstream NVMe market segment that is dominated by drives with TLC and DRAM and 8-channel controllers. Right now with holiday pricing, it is very easy to score a drive that doesn't have any of the acute weaknesses of DRAMless or QLC models, without paying a premium. The best example is ADATA's XPG SX8100, a TLC drive with Realtek's 8-channel controller with DRAM. The SX8100 is one of the few TLC models with a 4TB option so it competes against high-capacity QLC models, and beats many of them on price at all capacity points.
Our next look into consumer QLC SSDs will be Sabrent's Rocket Q4, the successor to the Rocket Q that adopts the Phison E16 PCIe 4.0 controller. Even though the newer Phison E18 Gen4 controller is starting to ship in high-end SSDs, The E18 is probably overkill for QLC models, and it's certainly more expensive. The E16 controller may stick around for a while to offer a more affordable path toward better QLC performance.
Next Review: SSD Benchmark Suite Update for PCIe Gen 4
This review marks the end of our current generation of SSD testing equipment and procedures. Our new overhauled test suite designed for PCIe Gen4 SSDs will be launching soon, along with a new section in Bench for the new test results. The existing SSD18 results will remain available with no further updates. Many recent drives we have already reviewed will be re-tested on our new SSD test suite and their results will be added to the new SSD21 section as they are completed.
75 Comments
View All Comments
DZor - Friday, December 11, 2020 - link
Today's drives have less and less endurance.This Corsair 1TB model just 200TBW
For example Samsung 860 EVO is 600TBW!!!! Three times longer!!!
rozquilla - Friday, December 11, 2020 - link
Agree, it is an almost disposable storage device. On the other hand an average office/web user will not reach this level of writes for years, but somebody using NVMe drives in RAID for content creation will need to have like an ammo box of these drives nearby to keep swapping drives.Tomatotech - Friday, December 11, 2020 - link
Maybe, maybe this type of drive, at this price point, isn't aimed at 'content creators'. Anyone earning a living off content creating is going to be using rather more expensive tools. Looks perfectly fine for the average user.In the recent Anandtech review of the QLC 8TB nvme drive, I was really quite impressed the way the 8TB drive leveraged its vast storage space to overcome many of the QLC limitations. It was able to use up to 2TB as high speed SLC-level cache. Many people will rarely move more than 1 or 2 TB in a single operation.
Looking forward to 8TB QLC+ drives dropping to mortal prices.
danbob999 - Monday, December 14, 2020 - link
The thing is, is that drive is 7 TB full, you don't get that same 2 TB cache. There is likely at most 256 GB left.TheinsanegamerN - Tuesday, December 15, 2020 - link
And how many users are going to move 256GB at once?at_clucks - Wednesday, December 16, 2020 - link
You're asking the wrong question. What happens when you have a full drive (like most regular users end up doing because data tends to cruft up in there), and now you juggle all your operations in the little space you have free? Sure, wear leveling you might say but again, in an SSD with sub-mediocre performance AND endurance that will not go well because that's a lot of data you move around to do wear leveling. Keep in mind that wear leveling isn't about getting lower total wear but rather getting uniform wear and spread out concentration of write cycles (it actually increases wear by write amplification). Eventually the drive, depending on how its WL algorithms work, will start moving the long stationary data around to the blocks that were used more, in order to write the more dynamic data to those "pristine" blocks. *All* of that data has to be constantly shuffled for the WL to work as expected. That's how WL and garbage collection work and it's great when you have a lot of free space and basically treat it as a small drive with 7TB to spare to make up for shitty QLC.You can't get something from nothing, having a lot of space makes the issue "less obvious" to the user, not "non-existent", and only if it's free. The issue is still there. The free space kept free is the price you pay for having a working drive. Like a CPU with 32 cores but you can never use more than 12 because they will out.
Maverick009 - Friday, December 11, 2020 - link
Even content creators do not have to worry as much, plus the serious ones still use Mechanical Hard drives, but usually the NAS quality ones like the IronWolf/Pro drives due to storage space per cost still being greatly cheaper. The SSD will be mainly used for the OS and applications to launch from, with a few using an SSD as a scrub drive, or RAID several mechanical drives together and use an SSD as a cache drive between them moving data much faster, while having also having the benefits of large storage.Beaver M. - Saturday, December 12, 2020 - link
No. You need a fast SSD when editing. A HDD is only useful for archiving anymore.niva - Wednesday, December 16, 2020 - link
Seriously, did you even read his comment?Beaver M. - Friday, December 18, 2020 - link
What? Youre acting as if what he claimed is any proof.