The Slot-1 Pentium II Test System AnandTech used was configured as follows:
Intel Pentium II 400 on an ABIT BX6 Motherboard
64MB PC100 SDRAM
Western Digital 5.1GB Ultra ATA Hard Drive
AOpen 32X IDE CD-ROM Drive
Windows 98 with all of the latest patches/drivers installed
The benchmark suite consisted of the following full version game titles
Forsaken - Running the Nuke Demo
Turok Dinosaur Hunter run with the '-benchmark' option
Quake 2 v3.14 using Demo1.dm2 and Brett "3 Fingers" Jacobs Crusher.dm2 demo
Ziff Davis' Winbench 98 was also used to test 2D performance
VSYNC was disabled during AnandTech's tests and was done so by using the following procedure:
Using the Windows 98 Registry Editor click on HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, then Software, then Matrox, then Current Settings and add the following string value with a value of 0 (use a value of 1 to enable VSync): Flip On Vblank
Thanks to Craig from Cyrellis for pointing that out to me.
The performance difference between the Millennium G200 and the Mystique G200 is negligible, which would make re-running every single test that was used in the Mystique G200 Review redundant. For more benchmarks visit the AnandTech Mystique G200 Review. The purpose of this performance comparison is to illustrate the performance difference between the Millennium and Mystique G200 cards.
Ziff Davis Winbench 98 - 2D Performance - 1024 x 768 x 16-bit Color |
||
- | Business | High End |
- | Windows 98 - P2 400 | Windows 98 - P2 400 |
Matrox Millennium G200 - 8MB | 211 | 269 |
Matrox Millennium G200 - 16MB | 209 | 269 |
Matrox Mystique G200 - 8MB | 207 | 269 |
Pentium II Test System - Quake 2 - Open GL Performance |
||
- | Timedemo - 640 x 480 | |
- | demo1.dm2 (Millennium/Mystique) |
crusher.dm2 (Millennium/Mystique) |
G200 Pentium II - 400 | 42.9/41.3 | 28.6/28.3 |
- | Timedemo - 800 x 600 | |
- | demo1.dm2 | crusher.dm2 |
G200 Pentium II - 400 | 29.1/29.0 | 23.5/23.3 |
- | Timedemo - 1024 x 768 | |
- | demo1.dm2 | crusher.dm2 |
G200 Pentium II - 400 | 19.8/18.1 | 17.0/15.8 |
If you don't mind giving up the TV-Output feature, the Millennium G200 is basically a Mystique G200 with a couple extra performance percentage points under the hood. The main differences between the two cards seem to exist at higher resolutions, as the Timedemo scores at 1024 x 768 differ by around 1 - 2 fps, while that doesn't seem like much, considering that the Millennium G200 is the same price as the Mystique G200, it's like getting those 1 - 2 fps free of charge. If you're not going to use the TV-Output, then why not benefit from the performance increase?
Pentium II Test System - Triple Buffering Performance Increase |
|
- | ZD 3D Winbench 98 - 800 x 600 x 16-bit Color |
-Matrox Millennium G200 - 16MB Pentium II 350 |
3D Winbench 98 Score |
Double Buffered Score | 587 |
Triple Buffered Score | 758 |
Triple Buffering seems very promising on paper, let's just wait for some more gaming support before jumping on that 16MB bandwagon just yet.
Pentium II Test System - Turok - Direct3D Performance |
|
- | Frame Rate - 640 x 480 |
- | TMark (Millennium/Mystique) |
G200 Pentium II - 400 | 109.5/107.0 |
- | Frame Rate - 800 x 600 |
- | TMark (Millennium/Mystique) |
G200 Pentium II - 400 | 103.1/99.7 |
0 Comments
View All Comments