Benchmark Summary

graph34.gif (36797 bytes)

The graphs speak for themselves, under NT, true power can be seen much more clearly than under 98.  The meaning behind that is twofold, it takes a considerable more power to excel under NT and conversely an extreme amount of power is overkill for Windows 98, especially if all you're going to be running is a handful of office applications while you surf the net. 

graph35.gif (35455 bytes)

It takes a bit more effort to achieve a high score under the High-End Winstone 99 test suite, as the HE tests are more FPU dependent than the basic business applications used in the Business Winstone test.  A secondary performance factor is, of course, L2 cache size and speed which helps the K6-III stand above and beyond its slower predecessors.  The Celeron performs decently in the benchmark, but clock for clock it loses out to the Pentium II/III.  Whether added price is worth the added performance the Pentium II/III will give you over the Celeron is up to you to decide.  Finally, the Athlon assumes a tremendous lead over the competition, who would've thought that AMD could have both the slowest and the fastest contributions to this test.

Office Applications - WinNT WinNT Benchmark Table of Results
Comments Locked

0 Comments

View All Comments

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now