Overview

Truth be told, I have not played with an ECS board in quite a while.  Every chipset, they come in with some product that does not really hit the radar – either in terms of price, availability, or performance.  Last year at Computex, they snapped up the award for ‘Best IC & Components’, and even showed off some of their P67 offerings (one of which will be subject to review in the near future).  In actual fact, ECS has 14 models of Sandy Bridge capable motherboard listed on their website – 4 P67, 6 H67 (1 ATX, 4 Micro-ATX, 1 Mini-ITX) and 4 H61 – so they’re definitely targeting a wide range of markets here.

After testing this board, I come away with mixed feelings.  There are certain things that ECS does quite well – the eJiffy application, 2D performance is quite good, idle power with no GPU is 13W lower than the ASRock H67, has a Debug LED and Power/Reset buttons on the board, and SATA write speeds.  However, there are plenty of things that the board does very poorly on – the BIOS is woeful, overclocking is non-existent, real-world USB performance lags behind the competition, and as the most expensive board in this roundup, leaves me scratching my head what that extra $20 is spent on.

Similar to the ASRock H67 board we tested, the ECS also fails to implement the maximum CPU turbo multiplier properly.  In single threaded mode, the CPU would run at a 3x multiplier increase rather than the 4x we are lead to believe.  It would vary rarely hit the 4x multiplier, but not in any constant sense.  In pure throughput terms, this makes the board perform worse than the P67 boards at stock, but as it has happened to all the boards here, then this must be down to a feature of the H67 chipset.

This board also defaults the RAM to a higher specification than some other boards.  If your kit is better than 1333 MHz C9, the memory will be set to 1333 MHz, 8-8-8-24 timings.  If the kit is 1333 MHz C9, then 1333 MHz C9 will be chosen.  These timings are oddly unchangeable in the BIOS. 

The ECS H67H2-M is a ‘Black Series’ edition ECS board, their premium H67 Micro-ATX model, and was available at retail for $140.

Visual Inspection

Despite what I said above, this board is quite aesthetically pleasing, as motherboards go.  The black and white livery provides stark contrast against offerings by other vendors, who like to stick to the blue and white scheme.  The VRMs are covered by a pair of heatsinks connected via pair of heat-pipes, and are considerably larger than those seen previously on even P67 boards.  This could be that ECS may have gone for cheaper VRMs that produce a little more heat to increase some profit margin, at the expense of VRM cooler size, and indeed the heatsinks are hotter to touch than the other boards, even when left at idle.

The socket itself has no trouble fitting the stock cooler or my Corsair H50-1 water cooling solution.  While there could be an issue fitting some larger coolers, one would not be needed, as H67 does not support CPU overclocking.  The Intel stock cooler does its job here quite easily, even at full load.  However, if you are going down the Corsair H50 route, there are not enough fan-headers to go around – I found one for the pump and one for one of the fans, but you’ll need a fan extension cable and/or a 3-pin to molex converter to get a second fan enabled, if you’re that way inclined.

The board contains 5 SATA ports – two SATA 6 Gb/s and three SATA 3 Gb/s.  All but one of these ports are angled.  Underneath these are the Power/Reset buttons, a welcome addition on any board, and usually paired with a Debug LED, which is located to the left of the chipset cooler.  The front panel connector here does not have the labels applied directly – you will have to hunt around the PCB to find which pin is which.  There is also no USB 3.0 header on the board, so all USB 3.0 has to be via the back panel.

The PCIe slots are laid out in an x16, x1, x1, PCI configuration, which leaves an x1 and the PCI slot free in case of dual cards.  I would have preferred an x1, x16, x1 arrangement at the top, as if you have a RAM fan cooler (such as the G.Skill we used in testing), having a dual slot long card in the PCIe x16 doesn’t let you fit that RAM cooler.  But in changing the configuration of the PCIe, something would have to be done about the lone SATA port sticking out of the board.

The back panel of the board contains the standard four video outputs with H67 – D-Sub, DVI, HDMI and DisplayPort.  We also have 4 USB 2.0 ports, 2 USB 3.0 ports (powered by an Etron controller), one eSATA 3 Gb/s port, a set of Audio ports including SPDIF out, and two Gigabit Ethernet connectors, which is a surprising addition on a H67 board.  Technically these ports (powered by Realtek RTL8111E controllers) support Teaming, to double the combined input/output if and when required – this is a very specific application but a more than welcome addition.  You will notice that ECS do not include PS/2 ports on the back panel, though.

ASRock H67M-GE/HT: UEFI, Overclocking ECS H67H2-M: Board Features, In The Box, Software
Comments Locked

56 Comments

View All Comments

  • james.jwb - Sunday, March 27, 2011 - link

    "However, I remember the time when I was a scrimping student. I wanted high gaming performance at the lowest cost – if Sandy Bridge was out then, and I was specifically after the Sandy Bridge platform over anything AMD, then a H67 with an i3-2100 and the biggest graphics card I could afford would be a viable option."

    When I was in this position, i'd go for the cheapest CPU and overclock it so it was faster than anything on the market. I'd be surprised if this wasn't the norm for people on a tight budget.
  • IanCutress - Sunday, March 27, 2011 - link

    My argument mainly for my comment is that the CPU is becoming less of a factor for gaming, thus shifting the focus away from a CPU OC to a large GPU. It used to be the case that the CPU made a large difference as well, but it my mind it's not that much of an issue with a strong default CPU speed and cores available. Nevertheless, the AMD + cheap tri/quad core is on the other side of the coin.

    Ian
  • slickr - Monday, March 28, 2011 - link

    Intel mobos are crap. Only for overclocking and only for graphics, where is the middle?

    And they are too expensive, hopefully AMD wipes the floor with them with their new Buldozer platform.
  • Jeffs0418 - Sunday, May 22, 2016 - link

    Here we are 5 years later and...Y'know I was ready to move on from my Athlon 64 x2 5000+/AM2 platform(which I liked but was marginal for modern gaming). I was stoked for a nice capable FX4100/Bulldozer platform. But after reading disappointing reviews I ended up with a Core i3 2120/Sandy Bridge and a H61 mobo. Currently running a Core i5 2500(non-k) massaged a bit to 3.9GHz on all cores with aftermarket cooling on P67 mobo. Never have used Intel integrated graphics so I couldn't care less about that. But I am glad I didn't go with Bulldozer and am comfortable enough with my current setup even now that I'm in no hurry to upgrade.
  • omelet - Sunday, March 27, 2011 - link

    Wouldn't someone wanting SB gaming on a budget be more likely to want an H61? You can get such a board from ASRock for like 60 bucks. That's $60 more you'd be able to spend on the GPU, and you'd still have every feature you need. The only real performance difference is that there's no SATA 6Gbps, but budget gamers don't have drives that need that anyway.
  • yzkbug - Sunday, March 27, 2011 - link

    Totally agree. I’m looking for a good, reliable, budget-priced motherboard for my new HTPC. Would love to see a comparison review of H61 motherboards, especially the power comparison numbers.
  • Taft12 - Sunday, March 27, 2011 - link

    I'd need to know at what point the 6 PCIE lanes on H61 begins to get in the way of the GPUs performance. Someone will surely do the testing to show us in the near future. Noticeable on, say, a 6850? Or do we need a much higher-end GPU for a bottlenect?
  • DanNeely - Sunday, March 27, 2011 - link

    The GPU would still be running on the 16 lanes from the CPU. You just have 2 less lanes for 2ndary slots and onboard devices. I don't think it's likely to be an issue except in that you're much less likely to get a second x4 slot (1/11 vs 6/16 on newegg), and the 1 H61 board that does it has legacy PCI slots for the other 2 spaces, while 5/6 H67 boards have at least 1 1x slot as well.
  • omelet - Sunday, March 27, 2011 - link

    This is very confusing. All the boards claim to have x16 slots, but they can't possibly run at x16 if none of the boards on the table even have 16 lanes. A P67 running two cards would have to run each at 4x, or even lower if there are any x1 slots on the board (as there are on most boards).

    It might be explained as being an x16 slot running at a lower speed, except for the fact that P67 and P55 both specify that they can run two cards at x8/x8, which can only mean that they run the x16 slots at 8 lanes each when you have two cards plugged in. That should also be impossible according to the table.

    Other sources I've found on the internet seem to imply that the x16 slot on the H61 runs at full x16 speed. I think perhaps we just need some clarification on what the values on the table here mean.
  • ajp_anton - Sunday, March 27, 2011 - link

    There are two sources for PCIe lanes. The CPUs all have x16 (only for graphics), the rest (what is shown in the table) come from the motherboard chip (H67 etc).

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now