The ASUS TUF X99 Sabertooth Review
by Ian Cutress on July 22, 2015 10:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
- Asus
- TUF
- X99
CPU Performance
Readers of our motherboard review section will have noted the trend in modern motherboards to implement a form of MultiCore Enhancement / Acceleration / Turbo (read our report here) on their motherboards. This does several things, including better benchmark results at stock settings (not entirely needed if overclocking is an end-user goal) at the expense of heat and temperature. It also gives in essence an automatic overclock which may be against what the user wants. Our testing methodology is ‘out-of-the-box’, with the latest public BIOS installed and XMP enabled, and thus subject to the whims of this feature. It is ultimately up to the motherboard manufacturer to take this risk – and manufacturers taking risks in the setup is something they do on every product (think C-state settings, USB priority, DPC Latency / monitoring priority, memory subtimings at JEDEC). Processor speed change is part of that risk, and ultimately if no overclocking is planned, some motherboards will affect how fast that shiny new processor goes and can be an important factor in the system build.
For clarification, the X99 Sabertooth does not have MultiCore Turbo enabled by default.
Point Calculations – 3D Movement Algorithm Test: link
3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz and IPC wins in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores. For a brief explanation of the platform agnostic coding behind this benchmark, see my forum post here.
Compression – WinRAR 5.0.1: link
Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30 second 720p videos.
Image Manipulation – FastStone Image Viewer 4.9: link
Similarly to WinRAR, the FastStone test us updated for 2014 to the latest version. FastStone is the program I use to perform quick or bulk actions on images, such as resizing, adjusting for color and cropping. In our test we take a series of 170 images in various sizes and formats and convert them all into 640x480 .gif files, maintaining the aspect ratio. FastStone does not use multithreading for this test, and thus single threaded performance is often the winner.
Video Conversion – Handbrake v0.9.9: link
Handbrake is a media conversion tool that was initially designed to help DVD ISOs and Video CDs into more common video formats. The principle today is still the same, primarily as an output for H.264 + AAC/MP3 audio within an MKV container. In our test we use the same videos as in the Xilisoft test, and results are given in frames per second.
Rendering – PovRay 3.7: link
The Persistence of Vision RayTracer, or PovRay, is a freeware package for as the name suggests, ray tracing. It is a pure renderer, rather than modeling software, but the latest beta version contains a handy benchmark for stressing all processing threads on a platform. We have been using this test in motherboard reviews to test memory stability at various CPU speeds to good effect – if it passes the test, the IMC in the CPU is stable for a given CPU speed. As a CPU test, it runs for approximately 2-3 minutes on high end platforms.
Synthetic – 7-Zip 9.2: link
As an open source compression tool, 7-Zip is a popular tool for making sets of files easier to handle and transfer. The software offers up its own benchmark, to which we report the result.
57 Comments
View All Comments
Shadowmaster625 - Wednesday, July 22, 2015 - link
lol it even has dust caps for the microphone port.Stuka87 - Wednesday, July 22, 2015 - link
Really a nice looking board. I like the PCI-E covers one slots you may not be using.Out of curiosity, why are you guys still testing with Windows 7 rather than 8.1? Will you guys be moving to Windows 10 soon?
AndrewJacksonZA - Wednesday, July 22, 2015 - link
As soon as it's commercially available and all benchmark software has been tested to make sure that they still work I hope. :-)Souka - Thursday, July 23, 2015 - link
What about Windows 8.1?abrowne1993 - Wednesday, July 22, 2015 - link
"It didn’t detect the DDR3 on the graphics card correctly though!"GDDR5?
Ryan Smith - Wednesday, July 22, 2015 - link
The R7 240 is a DDR3 card.Achaios - Wednesday, July 22, 2015 - link
@Staff: There is a rather huge issue with ASUS X99 motherboards destroying CPU's (5960X's, 5820k's, etc). Google "5960X Dead overclock.net".To my understanding, there is a chance that the ASUS X99 motherboard will raise on its own the CPU Vcore of the CPU to around 1.85V which, as we have learned, kills CPUs in a matter of seconds.
The latest incident reported was 4.5 hours ago. ASUS has refused to comment or acknowledge the issue. So, in view of the above, I would not buy an ASUS X99.
Achaios - Wednesday, July 22, 2015 - link
Correction: Latest incident reported 2 days and 8 hours ago on a "RVE", i.e. Rampage V Extreme X99. According to the person writing the report, he did try to RMA the board butQUOTE "ASUS were just dismissive and very unfriendly and said no".
Treating enthusiasts like dogs really angers me.
Gothmoth - Wednesday, July 22, 2015 - link
lol.... "enthusiast" who probably killed their system because they have no clue how to overclock.now they claim it´s a board problem. of course all x99 asus boards are affected.
i have SIX asus X99 boards and they run flawless for years.
an where is the source for the "incident" you reported?
without giving a source this is even more likr UFO sightings.....
Achaios - Wednesday, July 22, 2015 - link
http://www.overclock.net/t/1561131/5960x-dead