System Performance

Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system while in a single MSI GTX 770 Lightning GPU configuration with a wall meter connected to the OCZ 1250W power supply. This power supply is Gold rated, and as I am in the UK on a 230-240 V supply, leads to ~75% efficiency > 50W, and 90%+ efficiency at 250W, suitable for both idle and multi-GPU loading. This method of power reading allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency. These are the real world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor) using this motherboard.

While this method for power measurement may not be ideal, and you feel these numbers are not representative due to the high wattage power supply being used (we use the same PSU to remain consistent over a series of reviews, and the fact that some boards on our test bed get tested with three or four high powered GPUs), the important point to take away is the relationship between the numbers. These boards are all under the same conditions, and thus the differences between them should be easy to spot.

Power Consumption - Idle

Power Consumption - Long Idle

Power Consumption - OCCT

Power consumption in the idle states is actually pretty good, although loading the board pushes it down the order.

Windows 7 POST Time

Different motherboards have different POST sequences before an operating system is initialized. A lot of this is dependent on the board itself, and POST boot time is determined by the controllers on board (and the sequence of how those extras are organized). As part of our testing, we look at the POST Boot Time using a stopwatch. This is the time from pressing the ON button on the computer to when Windows 7 starts loading. (We discount Windows loading as it is highly variable given Windows specific features.) 

POST (Power-On Self-Test) Time - Single MSI GTX 770

Rightmark Audio Analyzer 6.2.5

Rightmark:AA indicates how well the sound system is built and isolated from electrical interference (either internally or externally). For this test we connect the Line Out to the Line In using a short six inch 3.5mm to 3.5mm high-quality jack, turn the OS speaker volume to 100%, and run the Rightmark default test suite at 192 kHz, 24-bit. The OS is tuned to 192 kHz/24-bit input and output, and the Line-In volume is adjusted until we have the best RMAA value in the mini-pretest. We look specifically at the Dynamic Range of the audio codec used on board, as well as the Total Harmonic Distortion + Noise.

Rightmark: AA, Dynamic Range, 24-bit / 192 kHz

Rightmark: AA, THD+N, 24-bit / 192 kHz

Audio results are middle of the line for the ALC1150 solution.

USB Backup

For this benchmark, we transfer a set size of files from the SSD to the USB drive using DiskBench, which monitors the time taken to transfer. The files transferred are a 1.52 GB set of 2867 files across 320 folders – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30 second HD videos. In an update to pre-Z87 testing, we also run MaxCPU to load up one of the threads during the test which improves general performance up to 15% by causing all the internal pathways to run at full speed.

Due to the introduction of USB 3.1, as of June 2015 we are adjusting our test to use a dual mSATA USB 3.1 Type-C device which should be capable of saturating both USB 3.0 and USB 3.1 connections. We still use the same data set as before, but now use the new device. Results are shown as seconds taken to complete the data transfer.

USB 3.0 Copy Times

Unfortunately we were not able to source a Type-C to Type-C cable in time for this review for the USB 3.1 port, although the USB 3.0 ports for Z97 seem to outperform those of X99.

DPC Latency

Deferred Procedure Call latency is a way in which Windows handles interrupt servicing. In order to wait for a processor to acknowledge the request, the system will queue all interrupt requests by priority. Critical interrupts will be handled as soon as possible, whereas lesser priority requests such as audio will be further down the line. If the audio device requires data, it will have to wait until the request is processed before the buffer is filled.

If the device drivers of higher priority components in a system are poorly implemented, this can cause delays in request scheduling and process time.  This can lead to an empty audio buffer and characteristic audible pauses, pops and clicks. The DPC latency checker measures how much time is taken processing DPCs from driver invocation. The lower the value will result in better audio transfer at smaller buffer sizes. Results are measured in microseconds.

DPC Latency Maximum

A good result for the Z97A Gaming 6, almost matching the Z97 Gaming 5 at just over 50 microseconds.

In The Box, Test Setup CPU Performance
Comments Locked

14 Comments

View All Comments

  • hansmuff - Friday, July 24, 2015 - link

    I'm a little disappointed that the UEFI seemingly wasn't reviewed.
  • hansmuff - Friday, July 24, 2015 - link

    And yes I see "take a look at our MSI Z97 Gaming 5 review or our MSI Z97 Guard Pro review for a more detailed analysis." Has nothing at all changed?
  • Refuge - Friday, July 24, 2015 - link

    Not really sure what is confusing about.

    "nothing new from our previous analysis"

    Seems pretty clear cut and simple to me.
  • LoganPowell - Friday, November 27, 2015 - link

    Good observation! I was also personally not very impressed with it. I recommend going for the CybertronPC Patriot instead. It's extremely highly rated among users (see http://www.consumerrunner.com/top-10-best-desktops... for example...)
  • MrCommunistGen - Friday, July 24, 2015 - link

    The last paragraph of "MSI Z97A Gaming 6 Overview" on page 1 as well as the last section of page 1 "BIOS and Software" mention it.

    It is a little ambiguous whether it is identical to previous iterations, or if only minor changes have been made, but Ian does say: "The conclusions are still the same..."
  • Shadowmaster625 - Friday, July 24, 2015 - link

    One USB 3.1 port? ONE? HAAHHAHA. It looks so stupid sitting in that row all by itself. What are these guys thinking?
  • thudo - Friday, July 24, 2015 - link

    Yeah thats truely pathetic. USB3.0 dead dead D-E-A-D while 3.1 is vastly superior in all ways to that olde has-been. All the USB3.0 should have, at a minimum, been replaced with USB3.1 Type-A connectors.. For shame.. >:[
  • tabascosauz - Friday, July 24, 2015 - link

    Hahahahahah

    Or maybe there isn't space on the board for that many third party controllers? Hmmm?
  • CrazyElf - Friday, July 24, 2015 - link

    To be honest, at this price point, I'd recommend paying a bit extra to get the MSI Gaming 7. You get a better VRM (12 phase - 6 doubled), a lot better rear IO panel, and a few other features.

    I just wish this thing shipped with an Intel LAN I218V or something similar. These Killer NICs I find tend to be more trouble than they are worth. None of them hold up a candle to Intel's server grade NICs either.

    Of course, I personally prefer to get OC oriented boards like the Asrock OC Formula, Gigabyte SOC Force, or similar boards, but that's just me. To me, most of these "gaming"boards aren't too good.
  • DigitalFreak - Friday, July 24, 2015 - link

    At this point I'd wait for Skylake.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now