Comments Locked

5 Comments

Back to Article

  • Death666Angel - Monday, January 7, 2013 - link

    "..commodities in the very worst way, with a tendency to drive to the bottom of the market."
    Really, worse than the 1366x768 laptops you routinely review? I find that hard to believe. :) I'm looking forward to the new tech and I hope innovation on those fronts (OLED, >1080p displays) is faster than in past years. :D
  • agent2099 - Monday, January 7, 2013 - link

    They’ll also be expanding their 2560x1440 (WQHD) offerings, something that’s sure to curl the toes of our Ian Cutress, our Senior Motherboard Editor.

    At what screen size? We don't need 2560x1400 on Anything bigger than 20 inches.
  • JasonInofuentes - Monday, January 7, 2013 - link

    They didn't mention screen sizes, but by highlighting diversity in the wqhd space I imagine we'll see several sizes as opposed to the 27" panels we see today. Ideally, we might see some 24" panels at affordable prices with decent features.

    Jason
  • Assimilator87 - Monday, January 7, 2013 - link

    What we really need are UHD displays in the 27"-30" range and WQHD in the 20"-24" range.
  • mcnabney - Tuesday, January 8, 2013 - link

    That's a big +1. IBM's original 4K display is over a decade old. You would have thought it would have found some company recently with 2560ish displays being stuck tablets now.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now